This week in
the supreme court, the issue of same sex marriage is being debated. Prejudice
against sexual orientation and human rights are at the forefront of arguments
on both sides. Although we have come leaps and bounds in the last 100 years in
the eradication of human prejudice, it seems we still have many hurdles to get
over. To take the idea of prejudice a step further, I'd like to address a topic
very near and dear to me - that of wildlife prejudice.
Whether you
believe in evolution or creationism, most people will agree that the diversity
of wildlife is astounding. Animals exist in the air, on land, and at sea, from
the highest mountains to the deepest burrows in the earth, in all temperature
extremes, in all corners of the world. We can think of species as being
intricately connected within a biological chain comprised of links within
links. There are direct links, for example the food chain, and indirect ones, such as symbiotic relationships.
|
Eastern fox snake c. L.Dunn |
Take, for
example, a seemingly insignificant fruit bat hanging out in a tree. That bat
feeds on the fruits of many species of trees and in turn flies great distances
dispersing those seeds in its feces causing new trees to sprout where they may not have otherwise. The leaves of the new trees may be eaten by
antelope, it's new fruit enjoyed by birds or elephants and one day a tiger
might prey on the antelope that was sustained by the tree. You get the idea. Each
species is a block in a huge interconnected world game of Jenga. Take one out,
and you weaken the system. It seems
regretfully pathetic to me that this knowledge is lost to a great percentage of
human beings. Some who seem intent on passing judgement on species that they
just don't like, for whatever reasons, and cooing like a baby when they see one
they do. I saw this first hand on my first day of University.
I had signed
up for the zoology program to fuel an innate desire to learn everything I could
about the various species that inhabit our planet. Nervously, I walked into my
dorm room that was to be shared with another first year zoology student. She
had already moved in and one wall of the
room that was officially on her side was plastered floor to ceiling with
national geographic photos. This wouldn't have seemed odd to me except that
they were all softly furred mammals with round, dewy eyes.
I set up the
personal belongings that I had brought with me including my turntable stereo,
books, and a small glass aquarium housing a little green anole lizard. When my
roommate saw the tank and its inhabitant she backed away like it contained
nuclear reactive material and demanded that I get rid of it. "I'm not
getting rid of anything" I replied, "this little lizard is perfectly
harmless". Our relationship was off to a wonderful start. Not
surprisingly, she lasted a year in the program before dropping out, not being
able to handle dissecting invertebrates to learn about their anatomy, or sitting
through slides of diseases caused by parasites of wildlife.
We, as a
society, are starting to become much more open minded about differences among human beings. Why then, can we not apply this to wildlife as well? Does an
animal have to be seen in cartoon form in a Disney movie or a computer animated
version in a cell phone commercial before we deem it "cute" and
worthy of a group advocating for its survival in the wild?
I have
always championed for those species which, due to fears and misconceptions based
on religious iconography, mythology and folklore, have been blacklisted for
centuries - snakes and other reptiles, bats, sharks, wolves....you name it. We
are the ones responsible for perpetuating the myths, for believing in
ridiculous religious connotations, for refusing to educate ourselves and learn
of their behaviour instead of fearing it, and have instead put unfair labels on
them. Is it really so wrong to want to conserve wildlife regardless of its
appearance or behaviour?
|
Eastern massasauga rattlesnake c. L.Dunn |
The truth
is, because of my education and desire to protect these species, without passing
judgement on them, judgement gets passed on me. I have found myself being introduced
at a party only to have the person add "she likes snakes" with a bit
of a sneer and a whisper like I might not be "right in the head". I
usually then spend the night sitting in a corner while the conversation
revolves around how someone once had a garter snake get into their basement, or
some other mundane trivia. It's as though "liking snakes" was all
there was to me, my life, my 5 years of
university education, and the 20 years I spent working with wildlife and
engaging in the conservation of countless species. It has affected
relationships with some folks, this "liking
snakes", and has made me as much of an outcast to those people as the
snakes are.
It would seem
as though wildlife prejudice and human prejudice may be somewhat related.
Perhaps it is just a general close-mindedness of some people and lack of
interest in the world around them. I hope that one day we reach the age where
we are all just humans, and wildlife is wildlife, and a tiny salamander or rattlesnake
or fruit bat will be seen as majestic
and important as any other animal and equally deserving to have a place in the
ecosystem that houses it.